EMC Latest
← Home

Whitepapers from Ametek CTS

View all →

A Practical Guide to Antennas for EMC Compliance

Ametek CTS

This AMETEK CTS technical note is a comprehensive reference guide for engineers and technicians working with antennas in EMC compliance testing. It begins with electromagnetic wave fundamentals — how electric and magnetic fields are mutually dependent, how they propagate, and how the Poynting vector describes the direction and magnitude of energy flow. Free space impedance (377 Ω) and power density relationships are introduced as the foundation for everything that follows. The antenna section covers the full set of key parameters: reflection coefficient and VSWR (both quantifying impedance matching quality), gain versus directivity (gain includes efficiency losses; directivity does not), effective aperture (linking gain to signal capture area), radiation pattern and beamwidth (including the half-power beamwidth trade-off between directivity and power requirements for immunity testing), and polarization (linear, circular, and elliptical — with the EMC-specific note that standards require both horizontal and vertical measurements, and that cross-polarization isolation matters in practice). The radiated and received power section derives the Friis transmission equation, free-space path loss (noting the 6 dB loss for every doubling of distance or frequency), and both the receive antenna factor (AF) and transmit antenna factor (TAF) — the critical conversion factors between measured voltage and field strength. Two worked examples illustrate real-world application: immunity testing with the CBL6111D BiLog antenna per IEC 61000-4-3 (30 MHz–1 GHz), and emission testing with the HLA6121 active loop antenna per CISPR 11 (150 kHz–30 MHz). A practical calculation example shows how to determine required transmit power for a 10 V/m field at 3 m and 10 m distances. An annex provides all logarithmic conversion formulas for power (dBm), voltage (dBμV), current (dBμA), and field strength (dBμV/m, dBμA/m) used throughout RF and EMC work.

Antennas

Amplifier Selection: What You Need to Know

Ametek CTS

This technical note from AMETEK CTS, authored by product manager Nick Jones, serves as a practical guide to selecting the right RF and microwave amplifier for EMC, communications, aerospace, and defence applications. It begins by explaining amplifier bias classes: Class A amplifiers conduct over the full 360° cycle, offering the best linearity, lowest harmonics, and strong VSWR tolerance, but at the cost of lower efficiency and higher heat output. Class AB amplifiers are more efficient and compact but can suffer from crossover distortion and require software-controlled VSWR foldback protection in many cases. Class B is generally unsuitable for RF use. The document then covers key specifications engineers must understand, including gain, gain flatness, harmonics, saturated output power, P1dB linear power, and load VSWR, as well as pulse-specific parameters such as rise/fall time, duty cycle, pulse width jitter, and on/off ratio. A dedicated section on VSWR protection explains that impedance mismatches cause reflected power that can damage amplifiers, and cautions readers to look beyond manufacturer claims of "infinite VSWR" protection by asking whether gain foldback is required and at what threshold. The guide then compares amplifier technology types: solid-state amplifiers (using GaAs or GaN transistors) handle CW and pulsed signals across many form factors, while Travelling Wave Tube (TWT) amplifiers offer superior power at higher frequencies but require high-voltage supplies, warm-up time, and often harmonic filtering. Pulsed TWT variants can deliver kilowatt-range peak power but must not exceed their specified duty cycle, typically around 6%. The document closes by mapping these considerations to real-world applications, including radiated immunity testing, 5G wideband intermodulation testing (which demands

Amplifiers

EMC Testing on Electric Vehicles

Ametek CTS

This technical note from AMETEK CTS, authored by Thomas Handschin, provides an introductory overview of EMC testing requirements for electric vehicles, intended to accompany a webinar recording. It explains that EVs operate across three distinct electrical systems — low voltage (12/24/48V DC), high voltage (the traction system replacing the combustion engine), and AC mains (for battery charging) — and that the high-voltage system, while comprising relatively few components, poses the greatest EMC challenge. The document maps out the relevant standards landscape across all three domains, distinguishing between international regulations and OEM-specific manufacturer standards. For LV systems, ECE R-10 and the ISO series apply alongside a sprawling range of manufacturer tests. For HV components, the emerging ISO 21498 standard (supported by major automakers) and ISO DTS 7637-4 are highlighted, covering voltage variations, load dump immunity, ripple testing, and RF pulsed immunity up to 10 MHz. For AC charging, ECE Regulation 10 Revision 5 is identified as the dominant legally binding framework, incorporating IEC 61000 series tests for harmonics, flicker, surge, and burst. Test setup details and equipment requirements are provided for each domain, giving engineers practical guidance on what is needed to achieve compliance.

Automotive EMC

Electric Vehicle Ripple Disturbances

Ametek CTS

This technical note from AMETEK CTS focuses on the origins, risks, and testing requirements of ripple disturbances in electric vehicle high-voltage systems. A ripple is an AC disturbance superimposed on a DC supply, primarily generated by the switching operations of inverter components during acceleration. The document explains that voltage ripples of up to 15 Vp can induce current ripples exceeding 300 Ap, and that such disturbances pose real dangers — including triggering battery management system faults, causing complete vehicle power loss, and physically damaging input filters in DC-DC converters. A central challenge discussed is the very low impedance of components like HV batteries and inverters, which can demand peak test currents well beyond 200 Ap and, in the case of inverters at resonance, theoretically up to 4800 Ap — requiring the test voltage to be intelligently limited based on the component's impedance curve to avoid destroying the device under test. The document maps the applicable standards, identifying ISO 21498-2 as the dominant international benchmark, alongside ISO TS 7637-4 and various OEM standards from Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, PSA, Renault, and Nissan, with test frequencies ranging from 10 Hz to 300 kHz and voltage amplitudes up to 40 Vp. Preferred test setup guidance favors transformer-based coupling for galvanic isolation over direct coupling. The note concludes with a ten-point checklist for selecting a ripple test solution, covering DC voltage and current ratings, impedance characterization, current limiting, safety, automation, and future upgradeability.

Automotive EMC